Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (EPM-RRTC)

2015-2020
Prepared for
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research

The mission of the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement (EPM-RRTC) is to support the disability and policy communities as they take on important policy issues. The Center’s research projects will provide information for the three priority areas: (1) program interactions, (2) Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) policy reform, and, (3) employment measurement.  Center researchers will generate and translate new knowledge about disability employment policy and ways to measure the labor market experiences of people with disabilities. In doing so, the Center will improve the quality of information about program interactions, policy options, and employment outcomes, increase evidenced-based advocacy and policymaking, foster more effective policies and practices, and ultimately, increase employment for people with disabilities.

In addition to other activities including providing technical assistance to stakeholders and policymakers, Mathematica is supporting the University of New Hampshire and other partner agencies with eight research studies over five years. These studies include:

Advancing Policy to Support Workers with Disabilities issue brief series

Investigators: Purvi Sevak, Jody Schimmel Hyde, Yonatan Ben-Shalom

An issue brief series released by Hunter College’s Roosevelt House and co-authored by Mathematica disability experts takes a closer look at advancing policies and programs to support workers with disabilities. The series considers the state of knowledge surrounding interventions to support these workers and seeks to synthesize research that can inform policymakers and other stakeholders of the potential impacts of a range of policy changes on the employment status of people with disabilities.

Learning from State Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies on the Eve of WIOA: State Differences in Service Receipt and Employment Outcomes by Applicant Employment Status

Investigators: David Mann and Sarah Croake

The Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act increased focus on State Vocational Rehabilitation Agency (SVRA) service priorities for several applicant subpopulations, such as transition-age youth, workers receiving subminimum wages, and workers with competitive and integrated employment.

This study uses VR administrative data on cases closed during fiscal year 2014 to examine state variation in outcomes for applicants in four different employment statuses at application similar to the subpopulations affected by WIOA, and identifies SVRAs with consistently strong outcomes. Specifically, it considers agency performance based on the percentage of VR applicants who received services and the percentage of VR service recipients who were employed at program exit. Regression analysis controlled for applicant subpopulation, SVRA, and other characteristics.

Benefit Duration and Return to Work Outcomes in Short Term Disability Insurance Programs: Evidence from Rhode Island’s Temporary Disability Insurance Program

Investigators: David Mann and Annette Bourbonierre

The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act strengthens the vocational rehabilitation program’s focus on providing early intervention services to keep workers with disabilities in the workforce. At the same time, some have suggested that short-term disability insurance (STDI) programs may hold promise as an early intervention service, helping people with disabilities stay in the labor force and avoid needing longer-term benefits. Rhode Island is one of five states with a mandatory STDI program.

This study used administrative data from 2011 to 2014 to explore Rhode Island’s STDI program—called the Temporary Disability Insurance program—and regression analysis to estimate the correlations of interest. We examine the extent to which Rhode Island STDI claimant characteristics are correlated with partial return-to-work (PRTW) benefit receipt and certain STDI benefit receipt duration measures. Regression adjusted estimates revealed that claimants opting to receive PRTW benefits earned more and received benefits for fewer weeks than claimants opting to not receive PRTW benefits.  We also observed significant correlations between duration of benefit receipt and claimant characteristics such as diagnosis and treating healthcare provider specialty.

Employers’ Perspectives on Accommodation and Retaining Employees with New Health Problems: An Exploratory Study

Investigators: Alix Gould-Werth, Katherine Morrison, Yonatan Ben-Shalom

Timely and appropriate accommodations can help employees who experience new health problems stay at work instead of exiting the labor force. Employers can play a critical role in connecting such workers with the accommodations they need. This qualitative study seeks to inform policy makers who want to improve workforce retention outcomes by uncovering factors that affect whether employers provide accommodations to, and ultimately retain, employees with health problems.

This study presents findings from semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of human resources professionals in 14 Arkansas-based employers, yielding detailed information on 50 cases in which an employee developed or disclosed a health problem. Consistent with prior literature, these interviews revealed that employers with greater access to resources and better ability to communicate generally made greater effort to accommodate and retain employees with health problems. However, employers in the study did not deploy these resources and processes consistently when making decisions about whether and how to provide accommodations to workers with health problems; employee-level characteristics affected their actions. Policy makers should consider intervention approaches that reach workers who may be overlooked by employers with scarce resources.

Do short-term changes in funding improve Vocational Rehabilitation outcomes? Evidence from the ARRA

Investigators: David Mann and Anna Hill

In response to the Great Recession, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was signed into law in 2009. The Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) program rather unexpectedly received $540 million in ARRA funding, which was primarily intended to serve more applicants and increase services to customers.

This study considers the impact of changes in VR funding levels on several outcomes, including VR service receipt status, employment status at program exit, and Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance receipt at program exit. We use ARRA VR funding as an instrument to capture the exogenous variation in state VR funding levels.

Trends in Health Insurance Coverage and Implications for Workers with Disabilities

Investigators: Jody Schimmel Hyde and Anna Hill

There have been considerable changes in the health insurance landscape in the last decade which may have altered the incentives to seeking employment and the coverage options available to adults with disabilities based on their employment status.

This study will use data from the IPUMS Health Surveys from 2011 through 2017 to develop annual statistics on (1) the share of the working-age population reporting a work-limiting health condition or impairment, (2) the share of the former who are working, and (3) by disability and work status, the health insurance coverage source and reported difficulties accessing care. In addition, we will document how insurance coverage and access to care vary by household poverty status and education. We will be able to compare workers with disabilities to non-workers with disabilities, as well as to workers who do not report such limitations.

The Impact of Expanded Access to Health Insurance on the Employment of Individuals with Disabilities

Investigators: Purvi Sevak and Jody Schimmel Hyde

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 substantially expanded the availability of health insurance coverage, particularly for adults with disabilities. One notable change was the option for states to offer Medicaid coverage to adults with household incomes that were below 138 percent of the federal poverty line; most states expanded Medicaid to this population.

This study investigates whether states that expanded Medicaid coverage through the ACA in 2014—the first year that expansion was possible under the ACA, and the year that most states opted to expand—experienced differential changes in the employment rate of adults with disabilities relative to states that did not expand Medicaid. Using nationally representative data from the American Community Survey from 2010 through 2016, we do not find evidence that the post-expansion employment trend across all states that expanded Medicaid in 2014 was significantly different from that trend in states that have not yet expanded Medicaid.

Considering Options for SSDI Reform: The Employment Eligibility Services (EES) Model

Investigators: David Stapleton, Yonatan Ben-Shalom, and David Mann

In 2014, the Center for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) created the SSDI Solutions Initiative to develop innovative ways to structurally reform the SSDI program. As part of that initiative, Yonatan Ben-Shalom, David Stapleton, and David Mann of Mathematica Policy Research wrote a chapter for the initiative’s book in which they initially proposed the EES. As proposed, the EES would be a state entity—supported by federal funding—that would change the gateway to SSDI by integrating the disability determination process with employment supports. The EES model was well received during the SSDI Solutions Initiative, and ultimately became the first proposal in the Initiative’s book.

A broad array of stakeholders has recognized that the EES shows substantial promise, but the plan has not yet been fully developed. This study will provide additional information on EES, and specify the elements outlined on NIDILRR’s website (i.e., developing measures that would be required to illustrate outcomes, specifying target populations, conducting field tests, and assessing the feasibility of conducting a well-designed intervention study).